Is Tulsa or Chicago more affordable?
Tulsa has a median rent of $950/month, while Chicago is $1,209/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Tulsa and Chicago.
4
Tulsa wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
Chicago wins
OK
Tulsa
IL
Chicago
Overview
Population
Median Income
+37.0%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
+27.3%Median Home Price
+46.1%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Tulsa is a city in Oklahoma with a population of 413,066.
Read full Tulsa guide →Who should choose
Chicago is a city in Illinois with a population of 2,742,119.
Read full Chicago guide →Tulsa has a median rent of $950/month, while Chicago is $1,209/month. Tulsa is more affordable for renters.
Oklahoma has a 4.75% state income tax. Illinois has a 4.95% state income tax. Tulsa wins on state income tax.
Tulsa gets 216 sunny days/year. Avg high in Tulsa: 70°F. Avg high in Chicago: 54.12°F
Tulsa. Chicago. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.