Is San Francisco or Los Angeles more affordable?
San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while Los Angeles is $1,852/month. Los Angeles is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between San Francisco and Los Angeles.
1
San Francisco wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
4
Los Angeles wins
CA
San Francisco
CA
Los Angeles
Overview
Population
Median Income
-45.2%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-13.1%Median Home Price
-37.2%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Who should choose
Los Angeles is a city in California with a population of 3,898,747.
Read full Los Angeles guide →San Francisco has a median rent of $2,130/month, while Los Angeles is $1,852/month. Los Angeles is more affordable for renters.
California has a 13.30% state income tax. California has a 9.30% state income tax. Los Angeles wins on state income tax.
Los Angeles gets 284 sunny days/year. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F. Avg high in Los Angeles: 75°F
San Francisco. Los Angeles. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.