Is Omaha or San Francisco more affordable?
Omaha has a median rent of $1,000/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Omaha is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Omaha, NE vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Omaha and San Francisco.
4
Omaha wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
San Francisco wins
NE
Omaha
vs
CA
San Francisco
Overview
486,051
Population
865,933
$61,272
Median Income
+105.9%$126,187✓
Cost of Living
$1,000✓
Median Rent / mo
+113.0%$2,130
$215,000✓
Median Home Price
+455.6%$1,194,500
20%
Rent-to-Income %
20%
Taxes
6.84%✓
State Income Tax
13.30%
7.00%
Local Tax Rate
0.00%
Climate & Weather
62°F
Avg High Temp
55.62°F
42°F
Avg Low Temp
48.76°F
213 days✓
Sunny Days / Year
N/A
31"
Annual Rainfall
N/A
Who should choose
Omaha, NE
Omaha is a city in Nebraska with a population of 486,051.
Read full Omaha guide →Who should choose
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Omaha vs San Francisco — Common Questions
Which city has lower taxes — Omaha or San Francisco?
Nebraska has a 6.84% state income tax. California has a 13.30% state income tax. Omaha wins on state income tax.
What is the weather difference between Omaha and San Francisco?
Omaha gets 213 sunny days/year. Avg high in Omaha: 62°F. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F
Which city is better for families — Omaha or San Francisco?
Omaha. San Francisco. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
More city comparisons
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.