Is Minneapolis or San Francisco more affordable?
Minneapolis has a median rent of $1,350/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Minneapolis is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Minneapolis and San Francisco.
4
Minneapolis wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
San Francisco wins
MN
Minneapolis
CA
San Francisco
Overview
Population
Median Income
+91.1%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
+57.8%Median Home Price
+279.2%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Minneapolis is a city in Minnesota with a population of 429,954.
Read full Minneapolis guide →Who should choose
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Minneapolis has a median rent of $1,350/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Minneapolis is more affordable for renters.
Minnesota has a 9.85% state income tax. California has a 13.30% state income tax. Minneapolis wins on state income tax.
Minneapolis gets 198 sunny days/year. Avg high in Minneapolis: 55°F. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F
Minneapolis. San Francisco. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.