Is Las Vegas or San Francisco more affordable?
Las Vegas has a median rent of $1,500/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Las Vegas is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Las Vegas, NV vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Las Vegas and San Francisco.
4
Las Vegas wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
San Francisco wins
NV
Las Vegas
vs
CA
San Francisco
Overview
641,903
Population
865,933
$58,573
Median Income
+115.4%$126,187✓
Cost of Living
$1,500✓
Median Rent / mo
+42.0%$2,130
$380,000✓
Median Home Price
+214.3%$1,194,500
31%
Rent-to-Income %
20%
Taxes
None✓
State Income Tax
13.30%
8.38%
Local Tax Rate
0.00%
Climate & Weather
80°F
Avg High Temp
55.62°F
56°F
Avg Low Temp
48.76°F
294 days✓
Sunny Days / Year
N/A
4"
Annual Rainfall
N/A
Who should choose
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas is a city in Nevada with a population of 641,903.
Read full Las Vegas guide →Who should choose
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Las Vegas vs San Francisco — Common Questions
Which city has lower taxes — Las Vegas or San Francisco?
Nevada has no state income tax. California has a 13.30% state income tax. Las Vegas wins on state income tax.
What is the weather difference between Las Vegas and San Francisco?
Las Vegas gets 294 sunny days/year. Avg high in Las Vegas: 80°F. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F
Which city is better for families — Las Vegas or San Francisco?
Las Vegas. San Francisco. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
More city comparisons
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.