Is Fort Worth or San Francisco more affordable?
Fort Worth has a median rent of $1,350/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Fort Worth is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Fort Worth and San Francisco.
4
Fort Worth wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
San Francisco wins
TX
Fort Worth
CA
San Francisco
Overview
Population
Median Income
+115.0%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
+57.8%Median Home Price
+304.9%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Fort Worth is a city in Texas with a population of 935,508.
Read full Fort Worth guide →Who should choose
San Francisco is a city in California with a population of 865,933.
Read full San Francisco guide →Fort Worth has a median rent of $1,350/month, while San Francisco is $2,130/month. Fort Worth is more affordable for renters.
Texas has no state income tax. California has a 13.30% state income tax. Fort Worth wins on state income tax.
Fort Worth gets 229 sunny days/year. Avg high in Fort Worth: 77°F. Avg high in San Francisco: 55.62°F
Fort Worth. San Francisco. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.