Is Chicago or Fresno more affordable?
Chicago has a median rent of $1,209/month, while Fresno is $1,100/month. Fresno is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Chicago and Fresno.
3
Chicago wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
2
Fresno wins
IL
Chicago
CA
Fresno
Overview
Population
Median Income
-27.6%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
-9.0%Median Home Price
+15.3%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Chicago is a city in Illinois with a population of 2,742,119.
Read full Chicago guide →Who should choose
Fresno is a city in California with a population of 542,107.
Read full Fresno guide →Chicago has a median rent of $1,209/month, while Fresno is $1,100/month. Fresno is more affordable for renters.
Illinois has a 4.95% state income tax. California has a 9.30% state income tax. Chicago wins on state income tax.
Fresno gets 272 sunny days/year. Avg high in Chicago: 54.12°F. Avg high in Fresno: 78°F
Chicago. Fresno. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.