USCityHubCompare
CitiesMoving ToCompareBest PlacesGuides

City comparison

Bakersfield, CA vs Omaha, NE

Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Bakersfield and Omaha.

1

Bakersfield wins

of 5 metrics

tracked

4

Omaha wins

CA

Bakersfield

vs

NE

Omaha

Overview

403,455

Population

486,051
$55,026

Median Income

+11.4%
$61,272

Cost of Living

$1,150

Median Rent / mo

-13.0%
$1,000
$310,000

Median Home Price

-30.6%
$215,000
25%

Rent-to-Income %

20%

Taxes

9.30%

State Income Tax

6.84%
8.25%

Local Tax Rate

7.00%

Climate & Weather

81°F

Avg High Temp

62°F
52°F

Avg Low Temp

42°F
276 days

Sunny Days / Year

213 days
7"

Annual Rainfall

31"

Who should choose

Bakersfield, CA

Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.

Read full Bakersfield guide →

Who should choose

Omaha, NE

Omaha is a city in Nebraska with a population of 486,051.

Read full Omaha guide →

Bakersfield vs Omaha — Common Questions

Is Bakersfield or Omaha more affordable?

Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Omaha is $1,000/month. Omaha is more affordable for renters.

Which city has lower taxes — Bakersfield or Omaha?

California has a 9.30% state income tax. Nebraska has a 6.84% state income tax. Omaha wins on state income tax.

What is the weather difference between Bakersfield and Omaha?

Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Omaha gets 213 sunny days/year. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F. Avg high in Omaha: 62°F

Which city is better for families — Bakersfield or Omaha?

Bakersfield. Omaha. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.

More city comparisons

Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.