Is Bakersfield or Minneapolis more affordable?
Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Minneapolis is $1,350/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Bakersfield and Minneapolis.
4
Bakersfield wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
1
Minneapolis wins
CA
Bakersfield
MN
Minneapolis
Overview
Population
Median Income
+20.0%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
+17.4%Median Home Price
+1.6%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.
Read full Bakersfield guide →Who should choose
Minneapolis is a city in Minnesota with a population of 429,954.
Read full Minneapolis guide →Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Minneapolis is $1,350/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
California has a 9.30% state income tax. Minnesota has a 9.85% state income tax. Bakersfield wins on state income tax.
Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Minneapolis gets 198 sunny days/year. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F. Avg high in Minneapolis: 55°F
Bakersfield. Minneapolis. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.