Is Bakersfield or Las Vegas more affordable?
Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Las Vegas is $1,500/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
City comparison
Side-by-side comparison of cost of living, taxes, climate, and quality of life between Bakersfield and Las Vegas.
2
Bakersfield wins
of 5 metrics
tracked
3
Las Vegas wins
CA
Bakersfield
NV
Las Vegas
Overview
Population
Median Income
+6.4%Cost of Living
Median Rent / mo
+30.4%Median Home Price
+22.6%Rent-to-Income %
Taxes
State Income Tax
Local Tax Rate
Climate & Weather
Avg High Temp
Avg Low Temp
Sunny Days / Year
Annual Rainfall
Who should choose
Bakersfield is a city in California with a population of 403,455.
Read full Bakersfield guide →Who should choose
Las Vegas is a city in Nevada with a population of 641,903.
Read full Las Vegas guide →Bakersfield has a median rent of $1,150/month, while Las Vegas is $1,500/month. Bakersfield is more affordable for renters.
California has a 9.30% state income tax. Nevada has no state income tax. Las Vegas wins on state income tax.
Bakersfield gets 276 sunny days/year. Las Vegas gets 294 sunny days/year. Avg high in Bakersfield: 81°F. Avg high in Las Vegas: 80°F
Bakersfield. Las Vegas. The right choice depends on your priorities — income, affordability, taxes, and climate all play a role.
Data sourced from U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and NOAA. Green values indicate a better outcome for that metric.